Hi,
no yet unfortunatly. because it breaks existing assignments, proper reordering would mean an assignment of an byte or an int, so that when you reorder, you keep the same assignment and you end up like:
A:1
D:4
B:2
C:3
this way, it will show the list like ADBC, but existing reference for B won't get lost, because it's still assigned "2"
Bye,
Jean